|
IMDB rating: 7.80 Plot: A modern day look at America’s war on drugs told through four separate stories that are connected in one way or another. A conservative politician who’s just been appointed as the US drug czar learns that his daughter is a drug addict. A trophy wife struggles to save her husband’s drug business, while two DEA agents protect a witness with inside knowledge of the spouse’s business. In Mexico, a corrupt, yet dedicated cop struggles with his conscience when he learns that his new boss may not be the anti-drug official he made himself out to be. |
Actors: Del Toro Benicio,Vargas Jacob,Chavez Andrew,Saucedo Michael,Milian Tomas,Yenque Jose,Rivera Emilio,O’Neill Michael,Douglas Michael,Jones Russell G.,Collins Eric,Holden Beau,Stader Peter,Lew James,Crime,Drama,Thriller,
Do you think the 10 American volunteers arrested were trying to drug traffic the Haiti kids?
Guilty or innocent?
They found adoptive parents in Dominica.
The charges are sadistic.
How can you fault anyone for trying to find homes for starving children caught in gang-ridden collapsed cities?
Liberal AssKicker | Feb 05, 2010
All the evidence so far points towards a knee jerk reaction by religious fanatics, more interested in the future s of the children than the law or themselves, I find it difficult to disagree with them.
Ron | Feb 05, 2010
Guilty, if anything of sheer stupidity.
Gypsy | Feb 05, 2010
They may have had the parents permission and good intentions but they did not consider Haitian law about leaving the country with minor Haitian citizens. I am not 100% on the good intentions part because some adoptive people seem to be so very desperate.
chairshot | Feb 05, 2010
Innocent of what YOU are insinuating.
I beleive they were honestly trying to do what was best.
The question is what exactly were they doing.
- Did they take these children who were either orphaned or who the parents gave up so they could give them a better life?
- Or were they thinking the kids would grow up with the evils of voodoo and therefore thought taking them, even without parental consent, would be the best thing for the child?
If it is the 1st, they are completely innocent. If the 2nd, although they might have had the best of intentions in their hearts, would still be kidnapping.
But they were Baptists. I am in Texas and I know Baptists. Although hyper-conservative, they aren’t typically the "holy-roller" types. So I think it is likely that they had consent from the surviving parents. Maybe they would still be guilty of some crime, but not kidnapping, which is what they are charged with.
Smart Kat | Feb 05, 2010
I don’t know what it means to drug traffic someone. I have a degree in criminal justice, but I have never before seen ‘drug traffic’ used as a verb.
Anyway, they’re clearly guilty. They’re guilty because they took children without any lawful authority to do so. That’s kidnapping, and they don’t seem to deny having done that. I can’t see any real basis upon which you could argue that they’re innocent.
Also, they weren’t taking orphans. They were taking children, with virtually no consideration as to whether they had families. They even lied to children, telling them their parents had died when they hadn’t, so that the kids would go with them. What they were doing was disgusting, those kids have been through too much already.
Yellow Alarm Clock | Feb 05, 2010